Although the difference in bits seems nearly undetectable, I found it made a wonderful difference in the look and feel of the chair.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73b0e/73b0e9013decb1b3a1a8e33287246c102455d1f5" alt=""
Here is a comparison of some 3/8 inch spindles and some 11/32nd inchers. The difference may be exagerrated a bit because the 3/8 inch spindles will receive one more cleanup shaving before going in the chair, but I was still surprised by the impact that 1/32nd can make visually and in the amount of flex.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f088e/f088ea765745e3271cfb307bd5ff8e9410479395" alt=""
When designing with split and shaved wood, I am constantly challenged to retain the flexibility inherent in the wood. Sometimes getting the size of the pieces right can take some trial and error. I've gotten used to making multiple parts.
So going forward, I plan to apply this size to some other chairs and see the difference. I'd appreciate feedback from anyone who might give it a try.
2 comments:
Peter, I've made about 40 windsors and most of them were made with an 11/32 inch spindle. It does make the chair look more delicate but does not affect spindle strength. On my most recent chairs I went up to 3/8 but I'll be going back to 11/32 for future chairs. 3/8 works OK for the big D seat Philadelphia chair, but in anything elst I find it too big.
Herman
veenendaal-period-furniture.blogspot.com
Herman,
Why didn't you tell me sooner! I looked at your work, very nice.I think I'll be sticking with 11/32nds as well,Thanks for writing,
Pete
Post a Comment